&
264
3.
his case & whitting lers uvere measures would answer just.
with come prisoners I find that me day's colitares confinemde on Rich & loater is quite enfficent to deter than from repeating
an offence while it will require Corporal Innusmus- & produce the came colitary effect on others less amenable to discipline Coubtless to an outerar it would sum unfair to punish tus prismers differently for an offence of the same nature Tout experience shows that the distinction is absolutely necessaryy and that it would be improper t
act smiswill-
I am not aware of any Esporale Ponsomment having been inflicted
prismer for more negligence in nost. But for wilful damage to material and persisant refusal to work the somoment of flossing may recorted to, or for any combination to Euglich work. At all counts recourse world not be had bouch scarre Measures mulso a prisoner had transposed
will he
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.